On Innovative's Lack of Innovation
Fascinating reading at "What I learned Today..."
This was posted on our Intranet by our head of Technical Services:
This year during the ILUG @ AALL (July 2006). There will be discussion on the State of the Innovative System. I would like to get your thoughts and present them during this discussion. Things that will be discussed are:
How has Millennium worked in your institution? What has it helped? What problems has it raised? Where does the Innovative system fit into the IT environment of your institution? … From the standpoint of you and your institution, where do you see library system software heading? Are there any implications for the overall business model?
So I of course had to answer - and since it was such a long answer and the kind of thing I’d usually post here I have decided to share my answer with you all.
I applaud Nicole and her sense of openess and honesty in sharing her thoughts. Read the whole post! I hope officials at Innovative do! Don't miss this most CLUEFUL ending:
It’s a new world and building onto a system that is more than 15 years old isn’t going to cut it anymore - there needs to be a new system, one that allows for more freedom, and it has to come soon, because more and more libraries are going to turn to open-source. I know that I’m ready to go out and lend a hand on one of the open-source LIS projects out there - especially if it means I get to have a system that will do what I want, how I want - and let me make changes when I want.