<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Professions Do Not Stand Still</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tametheweb.com/2007/08/02/professions-do-not-stand-still/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tametheweb.com/2007/08/02/professions-do-not-stand-still/</link>
	<description>Libraries, Technology and People</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 19:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://tametheweb.com/2007/08/02/professions-do-not-stand-still/#comment-341</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tametheweb.com/wordpress/?p=384#comment-341</guid>
		<description>Definitely plumbers have to work with PVC now (and actually the PVC stuff is easier to work with than copper).  

But if a plumber were to ask me to convert my water system because he didn't know how to handle copper, I would look for another plumber.

Staying relevant is more than about adopting technology.   You are probably not disputing this fact, but it has to be said.  We need to be covering all our bases, and I'm not totally convinced we can do this by converting all librarians to bloggers/techies.

That said, staff should know something about blogging (actually, they should know how to interface with your average web service is a better way to put it -- Blogger oficianados could still get lost using Wordpress and vice versa).
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely plumbers have to work with PVC now (and actually the PVC stuff is easier to work with than copper).  </p>
<p>But if a plumber were to ask me to convert my water system because he didn&#8217;t know how to handle copper, I would look for another plumber.</p>
<p>Staying relevant is more than about adopting technology.   You are probably not disputing this fact, but it has to be said.  We need to be covering all our bases, and I&#8217;m not totally convinced we can do this by converting all librarians to bloggers/techies.</p>
<p>That said, staff should know something about blogging (actually, they should know how to interface with your average web service is a better way to put it &#8212; Blogger oficianados could still get lost using Wordpress and vice versa).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curtis Rogers</title>
		<link>http://tametheweb.com/2007/08/02/professions-do-not-stand-still/#comment-340</link>
		<dc:creator>Curtis Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 20:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tametheweb.com/wordpress/?p=384#comment-340</guid>
		<description>I just blogged something very similar to this thought process. check it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just blogged something very similar to this thought process. check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy Judd</title>
		<link>http://tametheweb.com/2007/08/02/professions-do-not-stand-still/#comment-339</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy Judd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 19:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tametheweb.com/wordpress/?p=384#comment-339</guid>
		<description>OK...I was excited after I read this post, so my knee-jerk reaction was to comment quickly, thus the first comment.  (Sorry to fill the comments, Michael.)  Then, I read David Lee King's post from today, and thought these two blog posts had similar themes:  adaptation, growth, flexibility, change, and discovery.  David points out that there's not really a rigid set of boxes that one checks to verify that s/he is a 2.0 librarian, and in a similar way, there is no strict definition of what any of us sign up for when we get our MLS.  I do like the idea of moving  along the "spectrum" (or whatever one wishes to call it) in order to have a more realistic sense of what to expect when we enter the profession of librarianship.  Things certainly aren't the same now as they were even 5 years ago.  And, they won't be the same 5 years from now.  The lines are certainly blurred, as you point out...and, as David mentions/illustrates, I think as professionals we might be wise to see the value in evolving to meet the needs of those we got into this profession to serve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK&#8230;I was excited after I read this post, so my knee-jerk reaction was to comment quickly, thus the first comment.  (Sorry to fill the comments, Michael.)  Then, I read David Lee King&#8217;s post from today, and thought these two blog posts had similar themes:  adaptation, growth, flexibility, change, and discovery.  David points out that there&#8217;s not really a rigid set of boxes that one checks to verify that s/he is a 2.0 librarian, and in a similar way, there is no strict definition of what any of us sign up for when we get our MLS.  I do like the idea of moving  along the &#8220;spectrum&#8221; (or whatever one wishes to call it) in order to have a more realistic sense of what to expect when we enter the profession of librarianship.  Things certainly aren&#8217;t the same now as they were even 5 years ago.  And, they won&#8217;t be the same 5 years from now.  The lines are certainly blurred, as you point out&#8230;and, as David mentions/illustrates, I think as professionals we might be wise to see the value in evolving to meet the needs of those we got into this profession to serve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy Judd</title>
		<link>http://tametheweb.com/2007/08/02/professions-do-not-stand-still/#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy Judd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 17:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tametheweb.com/wordpress/?p=384#comment-338</guid>
		<description>Right on!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
