<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Excellent TTT Coverage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tametheweb.com/2008/01/14/excellent-ttt-coverage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tametheweb.com/2008/01/14/excellent-ttt-coverage/</link>
	<description>Libraries, Technology and People</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 01:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://tametheweb.com/2008/01/14/excellent-ttt-coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-644</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tametheweb.com/2008/01/14/excellent-ttt-coverage/#comment-644</guid>
		<description>Amazon may trust their users to post such reviews, but they DO edit them.  This includes reviews critical of right-wing books.  The criteria supposedly is that the reviewer must have actually read the book (supposedly determined by the post) instead of merely sounding off on the author and his/her politics.  Censorship does exist at Amazon.com, and it isn't confined to "obscenity".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazon may trust their users to post such reviews, but they DO edit them.  This includes reviews critical of right-wing books.  The criteria supposedly is that the reviewer must have actually read the book (supposedly determined by the post) instead of merely sounding off on the author and his/her politics.  Censorship does exist at Amazon.com, and it isn&#8217;t confined to &#8220;obscenity&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
