<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What I&#8217;m reading?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tametheweb.com/2008/02/26/what-im-reading/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tametheweb.com/2008/02/26/what-im-reading/</link>
	<description>Libraries, Technology and People</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Library Jargon</title>
		<link>http://tametheweb.com/2008/02/26/what-im-reading/#comment-1324</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Library Jargon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tametheweb.com/2008/02/26/what-im-reading/#comment-1324</guid>
		<description>[...] An excellent new paper has been published distilling a study on how well students understand library jargon, the tables alone (if you don&#8217;t want to read all six pages) are worth a look. 61% of those surveyed understood the term &#8220;catalog&#8221;. Sigh. Read the whole thing here. Via Tame The Web. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] An excellent new paper has been published distilling a study on how well students understand library jargon, the tables alone (if you don&#8217;t want to read all six pages) are worth a look. 61% of those surveyed understood the term &#8220;catalog&#8221;. Sigh. Read the whole thing here. Via Tame The Web. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
