http://nlabnetworks.typepad.com/transliteracy/2010/04/a-quick-code.html
Kristy McGill writes:
For a bit of fun, try taking this very quick transliteracy test…
Transliteracy Code from Kirsty McGill on Vimeo.
I will stress that this was designed only as a bit of fun – it is not, by any means, a definitive test! However, in producing it, I was mulling on two points related to transliteracy…
1.Our brains are designed to solve problems and spot patterns, which allows __ to miss ___ every third ___ without confusing ____. Whilst it is not possible to understand and demonstrate complete fluency in every type of literacy there is, the ability to find patterns and infer meaning must surely be a component part of being a transliterate individual?
2.The desire to understand and the ability to search out meaning must also be a factor in transliteracy. How many of you did an internet search to de-code the morse code or semaphore sections of the video? Does an ignorance of morse code or semaphore mean you are not transliterate? Or does the desire to fill in that gap and the ability to find that information prove that you *are* transliterate?
Something to ponder, anyway! 
I’m fascinated by the robust discussions of transliteracy and transmedia going on right now. I was interviewed last spring for an IFLA paper on the topic:
http://www.ifla.org/files/hq/papers/ifla75/94-andretta-en.pdf
and since then I’ve incorporated the topic into my classes.
I also invite you to link to and visit our Libraries and Transliteracy blog at http://librariesandtransliteracy.wordpress.com/ .
Michael, Thank you for helping to bring attention to the idea of transliteracy. It is an important topic for all libraries right now!
Bobbi
Hi Michael,
your blog is always a source of inspiration for me. Thanks for the Transliteracy test – I shall use it at the talk on ‘Transliteracy the latest stage of the literacy continuum’ which I am presenting at the Creating Knowledge conference next week.
Susie